LEADER 03737cmm a2200421 4500
006 m fo a u
007 cr n
008 050727s1996 miu fo m eng d
a| ICPSR c| ICPSR d| EYM
a| Small Business Benefits Study, Wave 2 (SBBS 2), 1992-1993 h| [electronic resource] : b| [Selected Metropolitan Counties in the United States] / c| Catherine G. McLaughlin
a| ICPSR version
a| Ann Arbor, Mich. : b| Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], c| 1996.
a| 1 online resource.
a| ICPSR v| 6667
a| Restricted for use by site license.
a| 1 data file + machine-readable documentation (text and PDF)
a| Also available in print.
a| Mode of access: World Wide Web.
a| Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2004-10-30.
a| Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. c| 15150
a| This is the second wave of a split-panel study first conducted in 1990 (SMALL BUSINESS BENEFITS STUDY (SBBS), 1990 [DENVER, FLINT, TAMPA, AND TUCSON] [ICPSR 6002]). Both waves examined the characteristics of small businesses and their health insurance markets. SBBS 2 also collected follow-up information on the respondents to the first wave. Firm-level data collected by SBBS 2 include type of business, age of the firm, number of years under the current owner, gross receipts, number of employees, and whether the firm offered health insurance. For firms that offered health insurance benefits, respondents were queried on the continuity of benefits, why firms changed insurers (where applicable), characteristics of the insurance plan, and how the firm would respond to a 25-percent increase in premiums. For firms that did not offer health insurance benefits, respondents were asked whether insurance was available in the last five years, why the firm decided to stop offering insurance if it had offered health insurance previously, whether the firm was interested in offering insurance, and factors that might influence the firm to offer insurance. Individual-level data on employees include gender, age, marital status, salary and wages, hours worked, and length of employment... Cf.: http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06667
a| Part 1: Raw Data File; Part 2: SAS Transport File
a| Data source: telephone interviews
a| Universe: Small businesses at seven sites in the United States with 2 to 25 employees working more than 17 hours per week. First-wave sites: (1) Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Denver, Douglas, and Jefferson counties, Colorado (referred to as ''Denver'' in ICPSR 6002), (2) Genesee County, Michigan (referred to as ''Flint'' in ICPSR 6002), (3) Hillsborough County, Florida (referred to as ''Tampa'' in ICPSR 6002), and (4) Pima County, Arizona (referred to as ''Tucson'' in ICPSR 6002). Second-wave sites: all four first-wave sites, plus: (5) Cuyahoga County, Ohio, (6) Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and (7) Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington counties, Oregon.
a| IX. HEALTH CARE AND HEALTH FACILITIES a| ICPSR IX. a| HMCA II
a| Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
a| ICPSR (Series) ; v| 6667.
3| Access to some datasets may require login with free personal MyData account. u| http://hdl.library.upenn.edu/1017.12/495107 z| Connect to resource