LEADER 01127nam 2200313 a 4500
006 m o d |
008 120426s2013 maua ob 001 0 eng d
a| 10.4159/harvard.9780674067547 2| doi
a| MiAaPQ c| MiAaPQ d| MiAaPQ
a| mau c| US-MA
a| H97 b| .M368 2013
a| POL 2| ukslc
a| 320.6 2| 23
a| Manski, Charles F.
a| Public policy in an uncertain world h| [electronic resource] : b| analysis and decisions / c| Charles F. Manski.
a| Cambridge, Mass. : b| Harvard University Press, c| 2013.
a| 1 online resource (xi, 199 pages)
a| text b| txt
a| computer b| c
a| online resource b| cr
a| Electronic reproduction. c| Askews and Holts. n| Mode of access: World Wide Web.
a| Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
a| Public policy advocates routinely assert that "research has shown" a particular policy to be desirable. But how reliable is the analysis in the research they invoke? And how does that analysis affect the way policy is made, on issues ranging from vaccination to minimum wage to FDA drug approval? Charles Manski argues here that current policy is based on untrustworthy analysis. By failing to account for uncertainty in an unpredictable world, policy analysis misleads policy makers with expressions of certitude. Public Policy in an Uncertain World critiques the status quo and offers an innovation to improve how policy research is conducted and how policy makers use research. Consumers of policy analysis, whether civil servants, journalists, or concerned citizens, need to understand research methodology well enough to properly assess reported findings. In the current model, policy researchers base their predictions on strong assumptions. But as Manski demonstrates, strong assumptions lead to less credible predictions than weaker ones. His alternative approach takes account of uncertainty and thereby moves policy analysis away from incredible certitude and toward honest portrayal of partial knowledge. Manski describes analysis of research on such topics as the effect of the death penalty on homicide, of unemployment insurance on job-seeking, and of preschooling on high school graduation. And he uses other real-world scenarios to illustrate the course he recommends, in which policy makers form reasonable decisions based on partial knowledge of outcomes, and journalists evaluate research claims more closely, with a skeptical eye toward expressions of certitude.
t| Frontmatter -- t| Contents -- t| Preface -- t| Introduction -- t| I POLICY ANALYSIS -- t| 1 Policy Analysis with Incredible Certitude -- t| 2 Predicting Policy Outcomes -- t| 3 Predicting Behavior -- t| II POLICY DECISIONS -- t| 4 Planning with Partial Knowledge -- t| 5 Diversified Treatment Choice -- t| 6 Policy Analysis and Decisions -- t| Appendix A: Derivations for Criteria to Treat X-Pox -- t| Appendix B: The Minimax- Regret Allocation to a Status Quo Treatment and an Innovation -- t| Appendix C: Treatment Choice with Partial Knowledge of Response to Both Treatments -- t| References -- t| Index
a| Includes bibliographical references and index.
a| Policy sciences.
a| Public administration.
a| Decision making.
a| Political planning x| Evaluation.
a| Electronic books.
p| $21.00 u| 01/29/2018 5| CBPA