Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. text file PDF
Phenomenology, together with Marxism, pragmatism, and analytic philosophy, dominated philosophy in the twentieth century-and Edmund Husserl is usually thought to have been the first to develop the concept. His views influenced a variety of important later thinkers, such as Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty, who eventually turned phenomenology away from questions of knowledge. But in this significant new work, Tom Rockmore argues for a return to phenomenology's origins in epistemology and does so by locating its roots in the work of Immanuel Kant. Kant and Phenomenology traces the formulation of Kant's phenomenological approach back to the second edition of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. In response to various criticisms of the first edition, Kant more forcefully put forth a constructivist theory of knowledge. This shift in Kant's thinking challenged the representational approach to epistemology, and it is this turn, Rockmore contends, that makes Kant the first great phenomenologist. He then follows this phenomenological line through the work of Kant's idealist successors, Fichte and Hegel. Steeped in the sources and literature it examines, Kant and Phenomenology persuasively reshapes our conception of both of its main subjects.
Frontmatter Contents Introduction ONE. From Platonism to Phenomenology TWO. Kant's Epistemological Shift to Phenomenology THREE. Hegel's Phenomenology as Epistemology FOUR. Husserl's Phenomenological Epistemology FIVE. Heidegger's Phenomenological Ontology SIX. Kant, Merleau-Ponty's Descriptive Phenomenology, and the Primacy of Perception Conclusion. On Overcoming the Epistemological Problem through Phenomenology Notes Index
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 24. Apr 2020)