Franklin

Family-oriented Cash Transfers from a Gender Perspective: Are Conditionalities Justified? / United Nations Women

Author/Creator:
United Nations Women.
Publication:
New York : United Nations, 2020.
Format/Description:
Government document
Book
1 online resource (1 online resource (5 pages).
Series:
UN Women Policy Briefs ; no.13.
UN Women Policy Briefs; no.13
Status/Location:
Loading...

Options
Location Notes Your Loan Policy

Details

Local subjects:
Women and Gender Issues. (search)
Economic and Social Development. (search)
System Details:
data file
Summary:
Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) are an increasingly significant component of national social protection systems. CCTs have been associated with positive effects on poverty reduction, increased school attendance and use of health services, as well as reductions in child labour. Some claim that CCTs contribute to the empowerment of women and girls. Whether or not the conditionalities attached to these transfers play a role in producing these positive outcomes remains an open and much-debated question. Against this backdrop, the brief reviews a decade of feminist research on CCTs that has raised serious questions about the assumptions that underpin the use of conditionalities and their impact on poor women's lives. The brief highlights particular concerns about the detrimental effects that conditionalities may have in contexts where quality public services are lacking and where multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination mean that well-intended programme requirements easily slip into coercive and disempowering implementation practices. To avoid these dynamics, it is critical to avoid conditionalities where possible and ensure that cash transfer programmes are accompanied by investments in quality public services and infrastructure that help women and their families to thrive.
Notes:
Title from title screen (viewed May 1, 2017).
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license.